06 January 2009

Kenyan Coalition Stress: Potential Omen

The governing coalition in Kenya is facing new strains after President Mwai Kibaki approved a controversial media law last week. The measure establishes a new communications commission that will regulate broadcasting content and impose tougher jail sentences for press offenses. International observers and local activists had bitterly opposed the law, staging demonstrations and protests in December.

For Mr Kibaki, the measure is designed to balance the media's freedom with its responsibility to "account [for] the overriding interest and safety of Kenyans." Many within the country, however, fear that the communications law will return Kenya to authoritarian government. Indeed, Kenya's vast array of media outlets is now subject to office raids and electronic wiretapping.

Kenya's Prime Minister, Raila Odinga, has openly opposed the bill saying that the expanded federal powers would be "oppressive to the democratic gains achieved" in Kenya. Messrs Odinga and Kibaki fought a tense election battle last spring, in which political violence claimed some 1,500 lives and displaced 300,000 Kenyans. A UN-brokered agreement brought Mr Odinga's Orange Democratic Movement (ODM) and Mr Kibaki's Party of National Unity (PNU) together into a power-sharing deal, but it has proved an uneasy alliance.

Not surprisingly, many analysts are concerned that a dispute over the communications law will send Kenya backsliding into political turmoil. Many officials with the ODM have complained that major decisions (such as diplomatic appointments) are being made without their consent. While the relationship between Messrs Odinga and Kibaki still appears cordial, mounting tensions will make it difficult for these leaders to hold their country together.

These are important times for Kenyan politics. Across the continent, Ghana has (for now) peacefully settled a December presidential election that produced razor-thin margins. The challenger, John Atta Mills, defeated the ruling-party candidate, a feat which Mr Odinga called a "rare example of democracy at work in Africa." Farther south, Africa is host to one of the world's most horrific heads of state, Robert Mugabe, who plans to unilaterally form his own government next month. Mr Mugabe appears to be doing everything in his power to drive a final stake through his earlier power-sharing agreements with Morgan Tsvangirai.

In recent weeks, Abdullahi Yusuf Ahmed resigned from his post as president of Somalia. While the flagrant anarchy in the Horn of Africa rendered this announcement largely ceremonial, Kenya should be concerned about the political forces in its northeastern neighbor. Should the coalition in Nairobi falter, there would be cascading fallout for democratic movements throughout the region. Even in South Africa, the recent democratic lodestar of the continent, there are populist tensions heading into 2009 election. Indeed, much depends on the ability of Messrs Odinga and Kibaki to manage Kenya's fragile coalition.

These are all significant challenges for Africa in 2009, and this review ignores the larger structural problems affecting Sudan, the Democratic Republic of Congo, and the Niger Delta. Certainly all of these political hot spots do not hinge on the Kenyan governing coalition, but leaders in Nairobi must make every effort to start the year off right.

2 comments:

Anonymous said...

President Kibaki recently announced that 10 million Kenyans were at risk for severe food shortages and promised to import maize, reduce the price of seed, and buy dying livestock.

Do you think Kibaki's media stricture could have been at all prompted by a fear of criticism of his (promised) responses to this politically dangerous crisis?

Also, on Jan 9th Kibaki responded to pressure against his new law by announcing that he would "consider amendments" to the act. Any insight? Think it's all for show?

Incidentally, the media backlash probably wasn't responsible for the recent open letter criticizing the Chinese government's flagrant television propaganda, but hopefully it was at least a bit validating.

Anonymous said...

I think it's tough to tell the exact motivations of Kenya's political elite. There were some reports that Odinga was actually on board with the new media law before realizing that his party had lined up against it.

Certainly politicians would like to be insulated from criticism and second-guessing on the part of journalists. I just think that such laws are misguided (at best) and authoritarian (at worst). It seems like Kibaki needs to build more political cover for his policies if he believes they will receive harsh treatment in the press. In doing so, he would need to give greater credence to this whole "government of national unity" idea and work with Odinga.